🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it seems it’s time for a rethink. As time has passed, an observance that started out as a commemorative event of the past, cultural identity and bonds between international African diaspora communities, has adopted a commercial tone, broadening to incorporate events where Black people are remunerated to talk to white audiences about hidden biases and active solidarity. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s sparked an increase in the enterprise of demonstrating racial awareness. Yet, that phase is now over. The surge has peaked, producing a diluted aftermath of what promoting consciousness is for.

The History of Black History Celebration

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with a week of remembrance and recognition in the second week of February. Black History Month grew out of this campaign and was publicly established in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the United States and Canada in February, but also in October in the United Kingdom, Germany, Éire and the Netherlands.

The observance has developed since its inception, focusing less on the accounts of colonial slavery and struggles for equality, and greater focus on influential individuals of color in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and extensively acknowledging the input Black people have made to shape the country. It is in schools where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with talks and cultural events. But the manner the celebration is celebrated is a indication of the current political situation. How it develops is a good lesson in how appropriation leads to dismantling: the restructuring of Black History Month has stymied the objective of it, which is to tackle structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how critical it is to reevaluate Black History Month as much as the current time in which it occurs this year. In the Britain, a reemerging right-wing in the shape of the Reform party is top in opinion ratings. In the recent season we saw the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in the history of Britain. the Conservative leader, the Black leader of the right-wing political group, is a firm opponent of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a situation where a elected representative gains confidence to say that the absence of Caucasian individuals in certain urban areas is a reason for concern. Simultaneously, extreme conservative groups are growing in the EU as a whole.

In the America, a significant offensive against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been carried, often successfully, to the top legal institutions of the nation. A drive to erase the history of people of color and legacy from the historical documents is under way. One of the former president's early administrative commands aimed at the museum of African American legacy, and the renowned cultural organization, claiming they of a coordinated and broad attempt to alter the country's historical narrative” by portraying America “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

In this context, the observance represents how insufficiently it can be effective if it is restricted to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or politically neutered celebrations of former accomplishments, rather than confronting the situation of the contemporary world. It also reveals how its limited duration means that it is separated from the more extensive continuous action that is needed. A university professor, a prof at an educational institution, put it best when she expressed apprehension about the short-term symbolic gestures of the celebration. “The issue with adopting a symbolic stance”, she commented, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month evolves into a brief show rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Figuring out how to alter, change and broaden efforts for racial equality and recognition in such times of discouragement and concern is a challenging endeavor. There is a temptation to just discontinue events including Black History Month completely, thinking they are simply not fit for purpose, or are relics of an period that has not worked.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and heritage of campaigns for equality – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and certainly, even commercial engagements – constitute an foundation that a significant effort has been invested in. It is there not just to decay as the politics moves on (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month appear as? To begin with, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is distributed across all seasons (as some institutions are already starting to implement), elements of its material (particularly around notable African descendants) integrated into educational programs. It would also be a time that does not avoid politics, and leaves space for individuals, particularly young people, to air their fears and experiences. What value has basic knowledge of the history when it ignores the current situation of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the urban areas? Institutions who observe it should not be pacified with the passive language of “unconscious bias” and awareness of “microaggressions”, but faced with the risks that face all if anti-racism is not treated with importance. In short, Black History Month should be made contemporary, pressing, and reactive. It could be that an complete renaming is in order – Contemporary Black History Month.